- #Iridient developer linux full#
- #Iridient developer linux software#
- #Iridient developer linux windows 7#
- #Iridient developer linux windows#
Much more flexibility/control over choices in sharpening, noise reduction, etc. It's got several things I like (especially compared to SPP): I'm just downloading it now and will try it ASAP. I was pleased to see that version 2 of Raw Developer, now called Iridient Developer, supports the DP Merrills. Sigma DP Merrills now supported by Iridient Raw Developer.
#Iridient developer linux full#
X-Transformer is the first product in a new line of minimal RAW conversion utilities from Iridient that will provide many of the high quality RAW processing algorithms from Iridient Developer in simple, easy to use utilities that can be combined with existing photo management programs like Lightroom to quickly achieve improved RAW image quality without having to spend the time learning or working with a more full featured RAW processor like Iridient Developer. All of the DNG converter products are planned for release on macOS in the near future and support for Linux is still a strong possibility for this product line in the more distant future. High priority manufacturers for future DNG converter products include Canon, Nikon, Sony and Olympus with other brands to follow depending on user interest.
#Iridient developer linux windows#
There are plans in early 2017 for additional DNG converter utilities to be released in addition to the current "Iridient X-Transformer" product which is specifically for Fujifilm RAF and only on Windows currently.
#Iridient developer linux software#
Quote Iridient Digital currently develops and publishes the following software products. Assessing it in its current state, my conclusion is to reach for my credit card and purchase a licence. I don't think one raw processor can do everything, and I usually have two or three to use depending on the subject matter.Īnd this is still very much beta software.
The best version of all came from brushing in a little Photokit sharpener. I tried putting the Iridient conversion with low sharpening through Topaz Detail, but really all the detail had already been drawn out, and there wasn't enough improvement to my eyes. The tree roots on the right are not sharper, but have more contrast.
I don't know what shows up on your screen, but on mine the grass in particular from the Iridient file looks more natural and the raw conversion seems to be better at avoiding "staircase" artefacts. Either Topaz or Lightroom seem to be more aggressive on edges.įinally here on the left is the version from Iridient with sharpening set to medium and the same file above from Topaz: Furthermore, some edges have visible staircase artefacts that are not so apparent on the file from Iridient. Now the version on the right now looks a little sharper, but on close examination I don't think it holds more detail. Here is a comparison with the same image from Iridient on the left and the Lightroom version on the right after being run through Topaz: I'm interested in detail more than sharpness, and to be fair need to follow my usual workflow for X-trans files an run the Lightroom image through Topaz Detail. Here is a crop comparing the dng from Iridient (sharpening set to low) on the left and Lightroom on the right with the above develop settings: This is not a review, but some observations after working on this photo (taken hand held and not intended as a test image): Now I have to lean closer to the screen to see what I'm doing. Re-setting it to the default of 100% solved the issue.
#Iridient developer linux windows 7#
The culprit turned out to be the fact that I'd set the display in Windows 7 to show text and other items at 125%. Initially the program wouldn't show the settings options in the main window. According to the website it "converts Fujifilm RAF images to DNG format using Iridient Digital's high quality RAW processing algorithms". Yesterday I played with the demo version of long awaited Iridient X-Transformer. I used to turn the detail up to about 80 for the X-T1, but a heavy use of that slider on the X-T2 files looks really nasty. Then sharpening in Photoshop using Topaz Detail II.
For X-Trans raw files I've taken to either turning sharpening off in Lightroom or using something like Amount = 20, radius =.